Photoshop can perform the process with good results and is the program I currently use in my workflow, but there is a level of manual labor involved to combine sky and foreground images after the stacking is complete, and Photoshop doesnt come free, which will be a deal-breaker for those on a budget.įree programs such as Deep Sky Stacker tend to work well for images without foregrounds such as deep space astrophotos however, I personally have never been able to get good results because of the steep learning curve and due to the foregrounds in my images. Star Landscape Starry Landscape Stacker Manual Labor Involved However, many of these programs either cost money or are not terribly effective at stacking images when a foreground is involved. Star Landscape Starry Landscape Stacker Manual Labor Involvedįirst, a simple RAW file editor such as Lightroom does not have the ability to stack images to reduce noise.Īnd second, if your image has a foreground in it, alignment of each exposure becomes tricky because the stars appear to move from frame to frame while the land below remains in the same place.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |